Archive

Live

NSSC 2014 LogoThe Northern Surgical Skills Conference (NSSC) is a national conference held in UK in order to give medical students a better understanding of what a career path in surgery entails. The conference is an all-day event that features guest speakers from the field, opportunities to practice basic surgical skills, such as suturing and laparoscopy, and presentations from student researchers.

As a member of the 2014 NSSC Committee, I have had the rewarding experience of planning and coordinating this year’s event that is to be held on Saturday, May 17th. As we are drawing closer to the date and finalizing the last details, I stumbled upon a reflection that I wrote after attending last year’s conference as a first-year medical student. I feel that the piece highlights the importance of early exposure to different specialities for medical students; especially considering how the medical world is becoming filled with ever-increasing niche roles, requiring students to distinguish sooner-rather-than-later the path they wish to take.

Read More

1. Collaboration: decision making; identifying problems; formulating alternative planning activities

2. Execution: implementation; in carrying out activities; managing and operating programs/events/projects

3. Equality: economic, social, political or other benefits individually or collectively

4. Evaluation: feedback; making adjustments; partaking in efforts of growth and change

Remember in school how they always used to tell us to be “active listeners,” that we had to be “engaged” and open to learning. Participating in class extended beyond doing the bare minimum of facing forward, answering a question when called on, or doing your homework; it was a creative process—participation was taking an active role in shaping and forming the life of the class room by contributing your knowledge and opinions to the collective mind of the class.

If this is the case, then why is that we cannot uphold the same standards globally in the context of developing countries? We western first-worlders see ourselves as proctors to peoples and nations that are “less fortunate” or who seem to have gotten stuck between the cracks of modernization. With global networking—and no doubt, marketing—we are becoming more unified in our efforts to aid one another into a state of development. Now, the level of interconnectivity we have reached makes it so that the weakness of any one node is no longer isolated, but can drastically affect the progress of several other nodes that share ties with it.

Yet still, even with all our efforts of crusade, all the cash we have guzzled into Africa, Southeast Asia, and South America, these countries seem in no better conditions than they were decades ago—in fact, many of the inhabiting countries are progressively doing worse. In modern day we are allegedly in the hindsight of the failure that ensue neoliberal international policie, which attempt to completely re-route the structures of developing nations to resemble those of the modern west, using capital finance as incentive. Although, the rather recent example of the United States denying aid to Haiti—ravaged by a devastating earthquake and an outbreak of Cholera—until the country had agreed to the adoption of “necessary democratic legislation” would argue that we have escaped this modern colonial mindset.

Change cannot happen over night.

And, if change is to occur, it absolutely must come from the ground-up. Only through grass-roots movements can we work together to create sustainable structures and policies that are unique to each country, population and environment. Furthermore, our role as foreign aid, is to help in whichever way we can to allow the voices on the ground be heard up in the heavens. Participation, in its full capacity (see definition above), must manifest at the lowest tier—the poor; the sick; the hungry; the victimized; the gendered; the voiceless—and recognized (inter)nationally in order for true success to occur.

I recently came across one of the essays I wrote during my senior year at New York University in Spring ’11. At that time I was taking two of the most eye-opening and informative classes I have participated in to this date: Philosophy of Medicine and Visual Culture of Science and Technology.

Philosophy of Medicine explored how our society approaches medicine as a whole: What do we believe medicine should do for us? When should we access it? How? What roles do/should medical professionals play? What is their relationship and duty to their patient?

The second class, Visual Culture of Science and Technology, examined how our society reacts, shifts and changes with the introduction of new technologies and media. The majority of the class did focus on medical technology, and how advances in the field have shaped the knowledge and behavior of both medical personal and the general public.

Needless to say, both topics were absolutely fascinating, and the fact that each class was led by top-tier professors, Dr. Brad Lewis, a licensed physician and cultural theorists, and Prof. Marita Sturken, the Chair of NYU’s Department of Media, Culture, and Communication, only enhanced the experience overall.

As I was milling over the topics in these separate classes, I could not help notice a great deal overlap and some connecting themes. Ultimately, I decided to formulate an independent project in which I connected the two disperate classes via an essay piece that tried to use the tools provided by these classes in order to analyze the “dominant culture” of medicine (i.e medicine as practiced in western, industrial nations), and how our current medical practices are failing to provide optimum levels of healing for patients.

Now, after dusting it off and re-editing my work over these past couple of days, I find myself wanting to re-write the whole piece entirely to include the new knowledge and experience that I have gained over the course of this past year. But that is not the point. The piece is genuine and honest in its search for understanding. It explores over-arching themes of caring vs. curing, molecularization of the body via technology, the influence of visual mediums on medicine, and the structure of science in society.

It’s a longer read, but I do hope you enjoy it. And of course, feedback and idea contributions are always welcome. Click the link below for the PDF.

The Path to Humanizing Medicine